1968 BMW 2800 vs. 2000 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2000 Toyota Opa is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2800 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 BMW 2800 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Opa. (150 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 BMW 2800 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Opa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 2800 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Toyota Opa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 BMW 2800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 BMW 2800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Opa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 BMW 2800 (235 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Opa. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 BMW 2800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Opa.
Compare all specifications:
1968 BMW 2800 | 2000 Toyota Opa | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 2800 | Opa |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |