1968 Buick Riviera vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Buick Riviera would be higher.
Because 1968 Buick Riviera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Buick Riviera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Buick Riviera (645 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 1968 Buick Riviera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Buick Riviera | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | Riviera | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 645 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
