1968 Buick Riviera vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Buick Riviera would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 640 kg more than 1968 Buick Riviera.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Buick Riviera | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Buick | Fisker |
| Model | Riviera | Karma |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 36 L |
