1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1590 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Brougham | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | Brougham | Elan |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
