1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Brougham | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | Brougham | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2290 mm |
