1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Brougham | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2480 mm |