1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1992 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Astro. (183 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 285 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Astro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Brougham | 1992 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Brougham | Astro |
Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4291 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2830 mm |