1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1994 Caterham Seven
To start off, 1994 Caterham Seven is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1994 Caterham Seven. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1994 Caterham Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1640 kg more than 1994 Caterham Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Brougham | 1994 Caterham Seven | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | Brougham | Seven |
Year Released | 1968 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 165 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2240 mm |