1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1995 Fiat 126
To start off, 1995 Fiat 126 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1995 Fiat 126. (25 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1535 kg more than 1995 Fiat 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Brougham | 1995 Fiat 126 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Brougham | 126 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 25 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 645 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 1850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |
