1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. (229 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 775 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Brougham | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Brougham | F200 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 408 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1405 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2700 mm |
