1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 345 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Brougham | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Brougham | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |
