1968 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2006 Nissan Almera is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Almera. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 650 kg more than 2006 Nissan Almera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Brougham | Almera |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |