1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Calais is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 995 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | Calais | Munga |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 74 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 31 L |
