1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 899 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 532 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 1982 Chrysler E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | Calais | E |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
