1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 550 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero. (239 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Calais | 1982 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Calais | Pajero |
Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2475 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 711 Nm | 239 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |