1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 558 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190. (153 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Calais | 190 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 72.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 100 L |
