1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. (118 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 915 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 567 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. (144 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Calais | 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Calais | 146 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 711 Nm | 144 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 75.7 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 51 L |