1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 345 kg more than 1968 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. (499 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Calais | 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Calais | Park Ward |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 711 Nm | 499 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 2450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 100 L |