1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2002 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2002 Chrysler 300 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler 300 (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 472 kg more than 2002 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler 300. (346 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Calais | 2002 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Calais | 300 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 711 Nm | 346 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 81 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 65 L |