1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1280 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 624 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
| Model | Calais | Matiz |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 38 L |
