1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 610 kg more than 2003 Toyota Condor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 515 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (196 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Calais | Condor |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |
