1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1361 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 609 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | Calais | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1810 mm |
