1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 705 kg more than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | Calais | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 104 L |
