1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (284 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 314 kg more than 1968 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. (427 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Calais | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Calais | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 711 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 2419 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2070 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1970 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 98 L |