1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 62 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Commander. (454 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Calais | Commander |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |
