1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 172 kg more than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (318 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Calais | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Calais | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 711 Nm | 318 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1933 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4775 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2781 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |