1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 892 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 538 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Calais | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Calais | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 711 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1213 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2436 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 40 L |
