1968 Cadillac Calais vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC90. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1968 Cadillac Calais.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC90. (420 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Calais | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Calais | XC90 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 711 Nm | 420 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |