1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1952 Fiat 1400
To start off, 1968 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 975 kg more than 1952 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac DeVille | 1952 Fiat 1400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | DeVille | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7732 cc | 1394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |
