1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1964 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1968 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1964 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac DeVille | 1964 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Taunus |
Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 40 L |