1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1964 Rover P5
To start off, 1968 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1964 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1964 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 280 kg more than 1964 Rover P5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac DeVille | 1964 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | DeVille | P5 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 52 L |
