1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac DeVille | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 57 L |
