1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1983 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1983 Lancia Beta is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Lancia Beta. (116 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1983 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac DeVille | 1983 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | DeVille | Beta |
Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1044 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 59 L |