1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1992 Rover 220
To start off, 1992 Rover 220 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1992 Rover 220. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 952 kg more than 1992 Rover 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac DeVille | 1992 Rover 220 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | DeVille | 220 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1153 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |