1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1968 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac DeVille | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | DeVille | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |