1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 346 kg more than 2000 Cadillac XLR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | DeVille | XLR |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |
