1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2000 Nissan El Grand is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 135 kg more than 2000 Nissan El Grand.
Because 1968 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Nissan El Grand | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | DeVille | El Grand |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1950 mm |