1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Kia Visto
To start off, 2002 Kia Visto is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 2002 Kia Visto. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Visto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1200 kg more than 2002 Kia Visto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Visto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Kia Visto | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | DeVille | Visto |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |
