1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Citroen C3
To start off, 2004 Citroen C3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (88 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1005 kg more than 2004 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | DeVille | C3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |