1968 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Because 1968 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac DeVille | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |