1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 7,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (375 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (712 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 674 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (38 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Fleetwood | Fronte |
Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 7725 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 712 Nm | 38 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5800 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 1970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 66 L |