1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 1987 Acura Integra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (375 HP) has 262 more horse power than 1987 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 1987 Acura Integra.
Because 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 1987 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | Fleetwood | Integra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1987 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7725 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 113 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5800 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2520 mm |
