1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (375 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.

Because 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (712 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 585 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Cadillac Fleetwood 1996 Rover 200
Make Cadillac Rover
Model Fleetwood 200
Year Released 1968 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7725 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 375 HP 103 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 712 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 109.2 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 103.1 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 5800 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 3380 mm 2510 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]