1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Sable. (153 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Fleetwood | Sable |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7733 cc | 2984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2600 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3810 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 85 L |