1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (375 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (712 Nm) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | Fleetwood | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7725 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 712 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 88.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5800 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 64 L |
