1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood weights approximately 1050 kg more than 2010 Ford C-Max. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Fleetwood | C-Max |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7733 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2600 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3810 mm | 2788 mm |