1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (375 HP) has 232 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Fleetwood | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7725 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5800 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2490 mm |