1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood weights approximately 860 kg more than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Because 2010 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Cadillac | Saturn |
Model | Fleetwood | Outlook |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7733 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 75.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2600 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3810 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 83 L |