1968 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. (185 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Fleetwood | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7733 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2600 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 63 L |