1968 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Chevrolet Camaro | 1959 Saab 95 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Camaro | 95 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2500 mm |